Study: Medical errors are not more likely in July than other months
Residency Program Insider, August 12, 2019
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Insider!
According to the lore surrounding the medical myth, July suffers more medical errors than any other month because of an influx of new medical school graduates starting their hospital training. However, this is not so, according to new research published this month in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
Researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston tapped the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and looked at more than 470,000 cardiac procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, mitral valve repair or replacement, and thoracic aortic aneurysm replacement performed between 2012 and 2014 on adult patients. For each procedure, overall trends were compared by academic year quartiles: Q1 (July to September with the least experienced residents) vs. Q4 (April to June with the most experienced residents), the study said.
The researchers observed no differences in mortality, in-hospital complications, costs, or length of stay between patients who were treated in Q1 compared to those in Q4, the study said. Study author Sameer A. Hirji, MD, called the findings "encouraging."
"While the perception of the 'July effect' persists culturally among healthcare providers, we hope that this study reinforces the fact that hospital systems have in place processes that help provide the highest level of care and ensure patient safety,” he added.
Study co-author Rohan M. Shah, MD, said the findings make sense because "cardiac surgery patients are managed in a multidisciplinary fashion...Therefore, the well-being of patients is not solely dependent on one individual, but rather on the entire caregiving team and so may be more resistant to changes in hospital staff," Shah said. "What this means for patients is that they should not be fearful or concerned about having surgery in July when the new residents are starting."
Hirji said that most cardiac surgery teams adopt "direct and strict" supervision of newly arriving trainees, with increased resident autonomy given as the year progresses. "The balance between attending supervision and resident autonomy constantly shifts during teaching," he explained. "This is a fine balance and, as indicated by this study, our specialty is doing a great job."
Source: HealthLeaders
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Skills of effective case managers
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- E-mailed
-
- Coronavirus vaccination: 4 best practices for communicating with patients
- Grievances, Complaints, and Patients’ Rights
- Including 46600 in E/M leveling systems
- How to get reimbursed for restorative nursing
- Five keys to creating a CHF disease management program
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Coding, billing, and documentation tips for teaching physicians, interns, residents, and students
- Coding tip: Know how to correctly code each procedure an otolaryngologist can perform on turbinates
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- Searched