Review goals and objectives
Residency Program Insider, May 12, 2017
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Insider!
Editor’s Note: The following is an excerpt from The Program Evaluation Committee Handbook: From Annual Program Evaluation to Self-Study.For more information about this book, click here.
Per the ACGME, each rotation at each postgraduate year level must have competency-based goals and objectives (G&O). Programs should review the G&O annually to ensure that residents have clear, current expectations for their rotations. One person should be responsible for tracking when G&O are reviewed and by whom, but the person does not necessarily have to be a program evaluation committee (PEC) member. For example, the program coordinator or education manager could be responsible for making sure that the G&O are reviewed and updated, and for documenting this in a footnote on the G&O document. Ideally, this should happen before the beginning of a new education year so that any changes can be instituted in July. Faculty such as educational liaisons or section heads are responsible for actually writing the specific G&O for each rotation and each postgraduate year level. Each program will have a different process, but for every program, the PEC “should participate actively” in the review of the G&O on a yearly basis, suggesting updates and revisions.
Note that the PEC does not itself have to review the G&O; rather, it can delegate this project, and it probably should do so if not all rotations are represented in the PEC. Delegating the review of certain G&O for certain rotations because expertise for a particular rotation lies outside the purview of the PEC committee members is still considered active participation in the review.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Math can be tricky: TJC corrects ABHR storage requirement
- Air control equals infection control
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Five ways to safeguard your patients' valuables
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Skills of effective case managers
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- E-mailed
-
- Air control equals infection control
- OSHA HazCom updates include labeling, SDS requirements
- Plan of Care Supports Documentation of Homebound Status
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies billing guidelines on proper billing for drugs in a single-dose or single-use vial, including billing for discarded drugs
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Modifiers and medical necessity
- Follow these tips to properly report bladder catheter codes
- Five ways to safeguard your patients' valuables
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Searched