Editor’s note
Residency Program Insider, April 15, 2016
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Insider!
Dear readers,
The iCompare research study looking into increasing medical residents’ consecutive duty hours continues to be a hot topic of debate. I recently read this blog post arguing that the study is unethical because it doesn’t seek informed consent from the residents and patients involved. Do you agree? Let me know.
Thanks for reading!
Son Hoang, editor, Residency Program Insider
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Residency Program Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Math can be tricky: TJC corrects ABHR storage requirement
- Air control equals infection control
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Residency coordinators’ responsibilities
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Study: Shorter shifts reduces residents’ attentional failures
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- RPA Subscriber Exclusive: February issue of Residency Program Alert now available
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- OSHA HazCom updates include labeling, SDS requirements
- E-mailed
-
- Air control equals infection control
- OSHA HazCom updates include labeling, SDS requirements
- Tip: Note new thyroid imaging codes
- Tim Porter-O'Grady sounds off
- Skills of effective case managers
- Q: Can you clarify the reporting of dates on the plan of care for diagnosis onset and exacerbation?
- Q&A: Defining Subacute
- Q&A: Are colleges sending students to our facility for rotations business associates?
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Fracture coding in ICD-10-CM requires greater specificity
- Searched