Payment Reform Expert Pans MSSP Track 1+
Physician Practice Insider, January 10, 2017
A healthcare payment reform advocate is calling on Medicare officials to shift away from agency's biggest shared savings program and to foster more alternative payment models that generate value for patients and taxpayers.
Harold D. Miller, president and CEO at the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, a non-profit, is lambasting the new Track 1+ in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and CMS.
"The CMS MSSP program has been a failure. CMS has lost money on the program for three straight years from 2013 to 2015, and the annual losses tripled from 2013 to 2015, totaling $216 million in 2015. CMS is losing money because nearly half—48%—of the accountable care organizations are increasing spending and the shared savings payments it makes to the ACOs that did save money wipe out any net savings it received," Miller says.
More healthcare providers participate in MSSP than any other ACO initiative that CMS has launched. Last year, 433 healthcare provider organizations participated in the program.
Until CMS rolls out MSSP Track 1+ in 2018, there are three tracks in the program, with varying levels of financial risk and shared-savings rates. MSSP Track 1 has no downside financial risk and the lowest shared-savings rate. MSSP Track 2 and Track 3 both have downside risk and higher shared-savings rates compared to Track 1.
Last month's announcement about the creation of Track 1+ highlights key elements of the new MSSP payment model, such as the opportunity for participating ACOs to qualify for Advanced Alternative Payment Model status under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act.
"The new Medicare ACO Track 1+ Model will test a payment model that incorporates more limited downside risk than is currently present in Tracks 2 or 3 of the Medicare Shared Savings Program in order to encourage more rapid progression to performance-based risk," CMS officials said in last month's announcement.
This article originally appeared on HealthLeaders Media. Read the full article here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Five ways to safeguard your patients' valuables
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Skills of effective case managers
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- E-mailed
-
- Plan of Care Supports Documentation of Homebound Status
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies billing guidelines on proper billing for drugs in a single-dose or single-use vial, including billing for discarded drugs
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Modifiers and medical necessity
- HIPAA Q&A: Cameras in patient rooms
- Follow these tips to properly report bladder catheter codes
- Examine cardboard boxes stored on floor to avoid infection control, life safety citations
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Consider two options for coding Rho(D) immune globulin given in pregnancy
- Searched