Site-neutral payment provision a potential win for physician practices
Physician Practice Insider, July 12, 2016
The site-neutral payment provision in CMS’ 2017 OPPS proposed rule could level the playing field for independent physician practices, the American Medical Association (AMA) said.
CMS is proposing to implement Section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, which requires the agency to stop allowing hospitals to bill certain services at off-campus provider-based departments under the higher OPPS payment rates. CMS proposed to pay the performing/supervising physician the nonfacility or office Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) amount. Hospitals would not be able to bill on a UB-04 form or receive OPPS payment for services at off-campus provider-based departments for 2017. CMS says it is exploring other options for 2018.
Although hospitals have slammed this section of the proposed rule, independent physician practices may see the odds turning in their favor. Making similar payments for similar services regardless of the facility’s ownership will reduce incentives for hospitals to buy up physician practices and consolidate health services in an area under a single entity, the AMA said. And by creating a more level economic playing field, the proposed rule could give physician practices the edge they need to remain competitive and independent.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Residency coordinators’ responsibilities
- RPA Subscriber Exclusive: February issue of Residency Program Alert now available
- Study: Shorter shifts reduces residents’ attentional failures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Editor’s note
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Prevent dehydration with nursing interventions
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- E-mailed
-
- White Paper: Postacute CDI: An Introduction to Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals
- Use modifiers -59, -91 to "explain" duplicate codes
- Tim Porter-O'Grady sounds off
- Q: Can you clarify the reporting of dates on the plan of care for diagnosis onset and exacerbation?
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- Fracture coding in ICD-10-CM requires greater specificity
- Eight tips to improve MRI throughput
- Searched