Inside best practice: Shared governance improvement
HCPro's Weekly Update on the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®*, July 23, 2010
The team developed a tool and distributed it to the unit-based council members and chairmen. This 11-question anonymous survey included an area where those were asked to list specific decisions made from the previous year.
The survey also looked at how long the council had been in existence, whether or not they had an elected chair, and how involved the director of the unit was for the council. Did he or she act as a mentor?
“When we asked them to give a number of decisions they had made in their unit council, the results were really interesting,” says Nancy Arata, RN, BSN, MBA, from the Athens Regional Medical Center Office of Professional Excellence. “Some units couldn’t come up with a number, or list out the decisions that had been made. But others could be very specific about these things.”
Source: This excerpt is from the July issue of HCPro’s Advisor to the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®. Don’t have a subscription? Take a look at the benefits of becoming a member of HCPro’s Resource Center for the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
- Searched