Copay assistance, patient balances up in downturn, but long-term payer contracts are greater concern
Medicare & Reimbursement Advisor Weekly, June 3, 2009
Although there haven’t been significant average sales price/average wholesale price reimbursement changes for specialty providers such as oncology practices, there’s concern on the horizon. Many practices lock in payer contracts for multiple years. Mid Ohio Onc/Hem in Columbus locked in contracts in January for three years in some cases, and the reimbursement is based on 2008 Medicare rates. “If rates go down, it will be harder for us to go back and negotiate better rates. And even if they don’t go down, what if inflation goes up? We could face a more challenging business setting than what’s going on today, making payroll harder to meet, for example, bringing in access issues,” says Glenn Balasky, executive director at Mid Ohio Onc/Hem. The economic downturn has lowered volume about 5% and increased patient balances by 20%, compared to this time in 2008, forcing the group to reduce staff time on Fridays and shop for lower drug prices—even 20-cent savings on generic support agents, says Balasky. Pharmaceutical assistance is tracking at about $70,000 per month, up 40% from the same time last year. Judy Stone, director at Carolinas Hem/Onc, says free drug assistance has tripled in the first half of the year due to flattening volume, higher deductibles, and odd plan policies that only cover inpatient chemo treatment. Stone is concerned that patients will present to the group more sick, “at a higher-stage cancer.”
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- OSHA fines hospitals for PPE failures related to COVID-19
- Complications from immobility by body system
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Prevent dehydration with nursing interventions
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- ACGME releases competency-based medical education guidance
- E-mailed
-
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Q&A: How should we code fluoroscopy for outpatient procedures?
- Q&A: How do we report skin substitutes not on CMS’ high- or low-cost lists?
- Plan ahead when creating a central billing office
- OSHA fines hospitals for PPE failures related to COVID-19
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies billing guidelines on proper billing for drugs in a single-dose or single-use vial, including billing for discarded drugs
- Nine ways to meet USP 797, get ready for your next survey
- Improve documentation with 15 tips for timely record completion
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Clearing up 2-midnight rule confusion
- Searched
