News: Appeals court ruling requires government to act on ALJ backlog
CDI Strategies, February 18, 2016
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
The government will have to comply with its congressionally mandated deadlines for reviewing claims at the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) level after a federal appeals court this week reversed a lower court’s dismissal of a lawsuit brought by hospitals.
The American Hospital Association (AHA) and other hospitals brought a lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in May 2014 in an attempt to resolve the longstanding backlog. The AHA argued that hospitals have billions of dollars in claims being held up and HHS should find a way to stick with its deadlines and clear the backlog. When AHA filed the case, the government had a backlog of approximately 800,000 appeals, which would take more than a decade to resolve at its current pace of approximately 72,000 per year.
The ALJ is supposed to decide denial appeals within 90 days, but the average processing time for appeals decided in 2015 was 547 days. As of this month, decisions had been pending for an average of 572 days, according to the appeals court.
A U.S. district court dismissed the case in December 2014, claiming the delay was “far from ideal,” but not egregious enough for the court to intervene. This ruling sends the case back to the lower court, noting “our ultimate obligation is to enforce the law as Congress has written it,” and that the lower court should order HHS to comply with the deadline if the agency, along with Congress, cannot come up with “meaningful progress” on the issue by the end of the next appropriations cycle.
Editor’s Note: This article was adapted from the eNewsletter Medicare Insider.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Five ways to safeguard your patients' valuables
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Skills of effective case managers
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- E-mailed
-
- Plan of Care Supports Documentation of Homebound Status
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies billing guidelines on proper billing for drugs in a single-dose or single-use vial, including billing for discarded drugs
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Modifiers and medical necessity
- HIPAA Q&A: Cameras in patient rooms
- Follow these tips to properly report bladder catheter codes
- Examine cardboard boxes stored on floor to avoid infection control, life safety citations
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Consider two options for coding Rho(D) immune globulin given in pregnancy
- Searched