Health Information Management

Column: MLN Matters article offers insight for CDI role

CDI Strategies, October 28, 2010

Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!

by Glenn Krauss, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS

The release of CMS Medlearn Matters articles Special Edition 1027 Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Demonstration High-Risk Medical Necessity Vulnerabilities for Inpatient Hospitals, sheds some interesting light on the reality of where we may extend our efforts at clinical documentation improvement.
Let’s take a look at some of the issues and points raised by CMS in this article that poses potential RAC vulnerabilities to our facilities, examine a real case study that plays onto this risk, and discuss the real opportunity of CDI specialists to improve clinical documentation and mitigate these potential financial risks.
 
Consider several provisions identified in the article, the first being the 17 DRGs identified as presenting high risk of medical necessity vulnerabilities.
 
A large share of claims under the RAC demonstration project within these DRGs were denied because the documentation submitted did not support the services provided. The articles point out that in many instances the service/procedure was medically necessary but the services could have been performed in a less-intensive setting. Often, these denials occurred because the submitted documentation did not contain sufficient, accurate information to:
  1. support the diagnosis
  2. justify the treatment/procedures
  3. document the course of care
  4. identify treatment/diagnostic test results
  5. promote continuity of care

Editor’s note: Krauss is a manager of clinical documentation improvement services at YPRO Corporation in Corydon, IN. Read the rest of the article on the ACDIS Blog. Note that the other article referenced, SE 1028, is currently under revision by CMS.



Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!

Most Popular