CMS approves bundled payments for knee and hip replacement surgeries
Case Management Insider, December 8, 2015
On November 16, CMS released a final rule that bundles acute care payments for knee and hip replacement surgeries, the most common type of inpatient surgery for Medicare beneficiaries.
Doctors performed more than 400,000 procedures on Medicare patients in 2004, which resulted in $7 billion in associated hospital stays. CMS decided to implement the bundled payment to improve the quality of these procedures, which officials say vary greatly from one hospital to another.
“Incentives to coordinate the whole episode of care—from surgery to recovery—are not strong enough, and a patient’s health may suffer as a result,” stated CMS officials in a written release. “When approaching care without seeing the big picture, there is a risk of missing crucial information or not coordinating across different care settings. This approach leads to more complications after surgery, higher readmission rates, protracted rehabilitative care, and variable costs. These are not the health outcomes patients want.”
To combat problems related from care disconnects, The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model seeks to ensure better coordination of care, prevent readmissions, and extended recovery times, and will also step up claims and compliance monitoring.
In the news release, CMS officials said the change will achieve those goals by doing the following:
- Making hospitals responsible for quality and costs during the care “episode,” related to the surgery, which extends not only from procedure itself, but 90 days after discharge
- Rewarding or penalizing hospitals that don’t meet established cost targets
- Bundling payments for care related to hip and knee replacement procedures to give “hospitals, physicians and other providers an incentive to work together to deliver more effective and efficient care”
Currently, the model is slated to be tested in 67 regions across the country. The program will begin April 1, 2016.
Got questions about the rule and what it means for your organization? Send them to Kelly Bilodeau at Kelly@phbphoto.com and we’ll have our experts answer them.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Residency coordinators’ responsibilities
- RPA Subscriber Exclusive: February issue of Residency Program Alert now available
- Study: Shorter shifts reduces residents’ attentional failures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Editor’s note
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- E-mailed
-
- White Paper: Postacute CDI: An Introduction to Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals
- Use modifiers -59, -91 to "explain" duplicate codes
- Tim Porter-O'Grady sounds off
- Q: Can you clarify the reporting of dates on the plan of care for diagnosis onset and exacerbation?
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- Fracture coding in ICD-10-CM requires greater specificity
- Eight tips to improve MRI throughput
- Searched