CMS asks if AOs offering consulting services have a conflict of interest
Briefings on Accreditation and Quality, February 1, 2019
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
BY A.J. PLUNKETT
Ever had questions about whether it was good or appropriate to pay your accrediting organization (AO) for consulting services on how to comply with the same standards they set that allows you to stay in business? CMS is interested in that question as well.
On December 18, the federal agency pre-published a request for information on “Medicare Program: Accrediting Organizations Conflict of Interest and Consulting Services.” Comments are due February 19.
“This request for information (RFI) seeks public comment regarding the appropriateness of the practices of some Medicare-approved Accrediting Organizations (AOs) to provide fee-based consultative services for Medicare-participating providers and suppliers as part of their business model,” according to the notice published in the Federal Register.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
Related Products
-
Briefings on Accreditation and Quality
Briefings on Accreditation and Quality will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission - 1 Year Electronic
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission - 1 Year Print and Electronic
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission - 2 Year Electronic
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission - 2 Year Print and Electronic
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Complications from immobility by body system
- Skills of effective case managers
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- E-mailed
-
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Q/A: Correctly determining billing units for drugs
- No separate charge for surgery-related IV
- Integral insulin administration
- History and development of shared governance
- Get the facts on coding for non-biodegradeable drug delivery implants
- Finding the right ratio of physicians and patients is essential for efficiency
- Confusion Prevails Over M0102 and M0104
- Clearing up the confusion: CPT codes 76376 and 76377
- Clarification: Anemia documentation and coding presents communication hazards
- Searched
