CMS surveyors agree to use Joint Commission recommendations on ligature risk as guide
Briefings on Accreditation and Quality, October 1, 2018
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
In a new memo to its state survey agencies, CMS said it would use Joint Commission ligature recommendations—drawn from a task force that was convened by the commission and included several CMS suicide prevention experts—as the federal agency goes forward with clarifying and updating Interpretive Guidelines for its surveyors.
Regardless of what organization you might use for accreditation, assess your hospital’s suicide prevention compliance against those Joint Commission recommendations with a detailed risk assessment and mitigation plan. If that plan includes renovations or extra staff and training, ensure your C-suite has budgeted money for those items to show surveyors leadership is serious about making changes.
Ensure staff understands policy
At least two hospitals this year each faced a CMS ruling that it was putting its patients in immediate jeopardy after staff failed to keep a continuous watch over at-risk patients even though the hospital’s own policy called for a sitter or other one-to-one observation, according to federal hospital inspection reports on HospitalInspections.org.
A finding of immediate jeopardy by CMS or The Joint Commission’s equivalent finding, immediate threat to life and safety, means a hospital could lose its ability to bill Medicare for services.
CMS announced it was embracing The Joint Commission’s recommendations in memo QSO: 18-21-All Hospitals, “CMS clarification of Psychiatric Environmental Risks,” from the Quality, Safety & Oversight Group (QSO), formerly known as the Survey and Certification Group, to CMS state survey agencies. It is dated July 20, although it was not posted online until August 1.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- E-mailed
-
- Coronavirus vaccination: 4 best practices for communicating with patients
- Q&A: Pressure ulcer POA code confusion resolved
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Keyes Q&A: Generator lighting, fire dampers, eyewash stations, ISLM fire drills
- Including 46600 in E/M leveling systems
- How to get reimbursed for restorative nursing
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Coding, billing, and documentation tips for teaching physicians, interns, residents, and students
- Coding tip: Know how to correctly code each procedure an otolaryngologist can perform on turbinates
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- Searched