University of Michigan hospital uses sound panels to reduce noise
Accreditation Insider, August 25, 2015
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Accreditation Insider!
To improve the patient care experience, the University of Michigan Health System has tested the use of sound-absorbing panels in hallways to reduce the noise level. A pilot study found that placing the panels in hallways around patient rooms results in a 3-4 decibel drop in noise. The four panels were covered in cones and made with sound-absorbing material; they were installed for three days in the walls and ceilings of a cardiovascular care unit.
Published in BMJ Quality and Safety, the study found that sound levels were 60 decibels in the daytime, but on the sound panel-enhanced hallways, the level was 57 decibels. The World Health Organization recommends that hospital sound levels not exceed 35 decibels. In addition, the University of Michigan has established quiet hours in all inpatient areas.
Read about the University of Michigan’s effort.
Read an extract of the study.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Accreditation Insider!
Related Products
-
Briefings on Accreditation and Quality
Briefings on Accreditation and Quality will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every...
-
The Satisfied Patient, Second Edition:
This fully updated book illustrates how focusing on patient satisfaction can better your organization, reduce the potential...
-
HCAHPS Basics: A Resource Guide for Healthcare Managers
HCAHPS spells worry for many hospitals. How will you ensure your hospital's HCAHPS survey data is in good light?
-
Performance Improvement Basics, 2nd Edition
Whether your goal is to gather buy-in from facility leaders or to brush up on effective data collection and analysis...
-
Effective Process Management: Improving Your Healthcare Delivery
This book will show you how to identify where certain processes fail or how they might fail in the future, and how to make...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Complications from immobility by body system
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Prevent dehydration with nursing interventions
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- E-mailed
-
- Q&As about PECOS and Physicians
- Q&A: Sepsis as a primary diagnosis
- Number of nurse practitioners increases by nearly 100,000 in seven years
- Note from the instructor: Billing Outpatient Laboratory Services - TOB 131 vs. TOB 141
- Learn how to read an OP report
- Inpatient-only procedures: Accuracy helps avoid denials, ensure compliance
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Coding, billing, and documentation tips for teaching physicians, interns, residents, and students
- Clinical Corner: Revisiting respiratory failure
- Clear up confusion surrounding observation services
- Searched
