Accreditation

Methods to address H&P-related standards

Briefings on Accreditation and Quality, February 1, 2008

This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.

Editor's note: Sue Dill Calloway, RN, MSN, JD, director of hospital risk management for OHIC Insurance Company, The Doctor's Company, in Columbus, OH, is the CMS corner lead contributor. Submit a topic idea to her by contacting BOJ editor Matt Phillion at mphillion@hcpro.com. It is interesting to note that the rule published in the November 2007 Federal Register about the hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) contained a revision to the hospital Conditions of Participation (CoP). This changes the revision to the federal law that became effective in January 2007, but only as it relates to history and physical (H&P) and postanesthesia evaluations.

This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.

Comments

0 comments on “Methods to address H&P-related standards

 

Most Popular