Tip: Say so long to eponyms in ICD-10-PCS

EMAIL TO A COLLEAGUE | PRINT THIS STORY | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVES

March 1, 2012

What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. At least Shakespeare says so.

And what does that have to do with ICD-10-PCS coding, you might ask? Well, you won’t find eponyms—words derived from the name of a real, fictional, mythical, or spurious character or person—in ICD-10-PCS. So you’ll need to know what that physician is actually doing.
 
For example, when a physician documents that he or she performed a Whipple procedure (and physicians will still use that term), you will need to know the physician performed a pancreaticoduodenectomy. (Yeah, Whipple procedure is much easier to remember and say.)
 
Similarly, an Abbott-Fisher-Lucas procedure is a two-stage technique for hip fusion in absence of femoral head, failed femoral prosthesis, or infected trochanteric mold arthroplasty. If you work for an OB/GYN, you’ve probably also seen documentation of Smead-Jones technique, a running closure technique used to approximate abdominal fascia, rectus muscles, and anterior peritoneum.
 
Physicians will not be required to change their terminology for documenting procedures in ICD-10-PCS (lucky for them, but not so much for us). So how do you know what the physician means by Gatellier-Chastang approach? The best way to know is to ask now.
 
Look at your documentation and see what eponyms your physicians currently use. Make a list, then make an appointment to sit down with the physicians and have them explain exactly what they are doing for each procedure. You’ll gain a better understanding of what your physicians are actually doing and you’ll get a leg up on coding in ICD-10-PCS.
 
Editor’s Note: This tip first appeared on the ICD-10 Trainer Blog.



Does your CDI program review records for patient safety indicators?
Yes
No, but we are considering expanding in this area
Yes, but we are only in the pilot program stages
No
Don't know
View Results      Archives