Tip: Say so long to eponyms in ICD-10-PCS

EMAIL TO A COLLEAGUE | PRINT THIS STORY | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVES

March 1, 2012

What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. At least Shakespeare says so.

And what does that have to do with ICD-10-PCS coding, you might ask? Well, you won’t find eponyms—words derived from the name of a real, fictional, mythical, or spurious character or person—in ICD-10-PCS. So you’ll need to know what that physician is actually doing.
 
For example, when a physician documents that he or she performed a Whipple procedure (and physicians will still use that term), you will need to know the physician performed a pancreaticoduodenectomy. (Yeah, Whipple procedure is much easier to remember and say.)
 
Similarly, an Abbott-Fisher-Lucas procedure is a two-stage technique for hip fusion in absence of femoral head, failed femoral prosthesis, or infected trochanteric mold arthroplasty. If you work for an OB/GYN, you’ve probably also seen documentation of Smead-Jones technique, a running closure technique used to approximate abdominal fascia, rectus muscles, and anterior peritoneum.
 
Physicians will not be required to change their terminology for documenting procedures in ICD-10-PCS (lucky for them, but not so much for us). So how do you know what the physician means by Gatellier-Chastang approach? The best way to know is to ask now.
 
Look at your documentation and see what eponyms your physicians currently use. Make a list, then make an appointment to sit down with the physicians and have them explain exactly what they are doing for each procedure. You’ll gain a better understanding of what your physicians are actually doing and you’ll get a leg up on coding in ICD-10-PCS.
 
Editor’s Note: This tip first appeared on the ICD-10 Trainer Blog.



Has your EHR improved physician CDI adoption and query response rates?
We still are on paper
Don't know, we are in the middle of transitioning to electronic records
It's worse than when we had paper charts
I see no difference
Some inconsistent improvement
Big improvement, the doctors love it!
We do't trend or measure this
Our doctors threw the computers out the window in frustration
View Results      Archives