Fulfilling new AAAHC standard 9.W
Ambulatory Safety Monitor, February 2, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
When the AAAHC updated its standards for 2006, one area undergoing a notable change was Chapter 9: Anesthesia Services in the Accreditation Handbook for Ambulatory Health Care. The new standard included in this chapter-formerly 9.V and now 9.W-reads, "Organizations that provide sedative, hypnotic, or analgesic drugs that do not have an antagonist medication (e.g., propofol) will identify who in the organization is privileged to administer these drugs, and the organization will have a written protocol of how the organization will respond in the event that a deeper-than-intended level of anesthesia occurs."
"We are really addressing patient safety and pointing back to our standards in 2.II about credentialing and privileging," says Stephen Kaufman, RN, MA, AAAHC senior director of accreditation. "We're not telling organizations to do anything new or different, but we are reminding them of their obligation to ensure patient safety by properly and appropriately credentialing and privileging the healthcare professionals who provide the services that are offered."
Thus, when surveyors visit your facility, they will want to see written protocol and documentation that you have properly credentialed and privileged the members of your organization who provide these types of drugs.
This tip was adapted from Briefings on Ambulatory Accreditation, a monthly publication that reports on the activities of ambulatory care accreditors, the JCAHO, and the AAAHC. Click here for more information or to subscribe.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- First board certification for hospitalists announced -- with caution
- Searched
