Surgical fire Patient Safety Goal again goes MIA
Hospital Safety Connection, June 1, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
In the healthcare world, the unveiling of Watergate's "Deep Throat" was quickly overshadowed by the revelation of the 2006 National Patient Safety Goals.
For safety professionals, though, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' list was more notable by what was missing: a mandate to reduce the risk of surgical fires.
The idea of a surgical fire goal always seems to come up, but eventually other goals bump it. To read the upcoming 2006 goals, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
