Be aware of extensive QI revisions to Chapter 5
Ambulatory Safety Monitor, May 19, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
The AAAHC's revised Chapter 5: Quality Management and Improvement contains several changes in subchapter II regarding the quality improvement (QI) program. Elements of a QI program, QI studies, and benchmarking highlight the revised section, says Joan Riebock, the AAAHC's senior director of program operations. "We wanted to help organizations understand the characteristics of developing an effective QI program so they can build on that framework," she says.
Recognize changes to the language
In the interest of consistency, the AAAHC began using the word "activity" in this edition of the standards. Found in standard 5.II.A.6, for example, activity is synonymous with "study" in this context. Also remember that use of the term "healthcare professionals" in this chapter includes all clinical and administrative personnel.
Build a quality QI program
Other changes to the subchapter's content include nine additions to standard A, which outline the characteristics of the QI program. These additions were made because the AAAHC says organizations needed more clarity in this area. Following are the new standards:
Closing the loop
AAAHC participants realize the importance of "closing the QI loop." The accreditor previously defined closing the loop as completing the five predetermined steps of a successful QI activity. The 2005 revisions expand section B, and it now contains seven requirements. The following are new to the list this year:
The AAAHC also expanded the list of potential study topics to help you close the loop. New areas to consider include testing new or enhanced processes or methods of care; benchmarking against best practices, professional practice guidelines, and performance measures; and short- or long-term planning goals.
New direction for benchmarking
"Organizations frequently tell us they have difficulty doing benchmarking because they have nothing to benchmark against," Riebock says. To help organizations overcome this common obstacle, the AAAHC modified section C of subchapter 5.II, which covers the process.
Many small, single-specialty ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) struggle with the approach that requires them to benchmark themselves against other facilities because finding a similar organizational model is difficult. Rather than searching for an identical organization with which to compare yours, the AAAHC now allows you to benchmark against recognized best practices of national or professional targets or goals.
For example, look for information from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality as a possible source, or other professional healthcare or medical organizations such as the Federated Ambulatory Surgery Association or the AAAHC's Institute for Quality Improvement. Other sources for benchmarking opportunities include published studies in peer review journals. Literature may include reports on topics such as infection rates or postsurgery nausea.
Regardless of which type of benchmarking your organization takes on, getting started is key.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
