Syringe scare leads to FDA alert
Ambulatory Safety Monitor, February 10, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last week reissued a nationwide alert concerning batches of preloaded syringes that may be contaminated. The alert, which was originally passed on to consumers on January 31, was renewed following the discovery of new cases of infection that may be related to the syringes.
According to a release from the FDA, a number of patients have recently developed pseudomonas fluorescens (or P. fluorescens) infections of the blood, and investigators say the illnesses could be connected to the syringes. P. fluorescens is an infrequent cause of infection, but has been reported to cause outbreaks of pseudobacteremia, i.e., presence in a blood culture in the absence of clinical evidence of bloodstream infection. P. fluorescens has also been reported as the cause of procedure-related infections and infections resulting from transfusion with contaminated blood components.
The syringes in question were manufactured by IV Flush, LLC, and distributed by Pinnacle Medical Supply of Rowlett, TX. The preloaded syringes contained either heparin or sodium chloride intravenous catheter flushes, and were voluntarily recalled by the manufacturer. The products were not cleared by the FDA for marketing at the time of their distribution.
The FDA warns facilities not to use any of these syringes, which clearly designate "IV Flush Dallas, TX" on their labels. IV Flush is also asking all its distributors to call their customers to warn them about the syringes, and the company is arranging for the return of all products recalled.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
