ASCs could see big business from implantable lenses
Ambulatory Safety Monitor, November 11, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
A vision correction procedure recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) could represent the next big thing in ophthalmologic treatment performed at ASCs.
According to a story published this month in Newsday, the implantable lens-developed overseas and approved by the FDA in September-is offering hope to patients with moderate to extreme nearsightedness for whom laser surgery and the conventional treatments are not helpful. The 30-minute procedure, which costs $3,000 to $5,000 per eye, involves a device called the Verisyse lens that surgeons implant under the eye's natural lens. The procedure is too complex to be done in a doctor's office, so physicians must conduct the surgery in an ASC.
The popular LASIK surgery-in which a physician uses a laser to sculpt a prescription onto a patient's cornea-still remains the most widespread current trend in vision treatment. But it's estimated that three million Americans with vision problems are not candidates for LASIK because they have extreme vision problems, thin corneas or other medical conditions. The implantable lens is a better alternative for these individuals because they produce less glare or hazy vision than LASIK, and surgeons can remove and exchange them for another lens if the patient isn't satisfied with their vision quality.
The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery offered its endorsement of the new procedure, with Director of Communications John Ciccone saying, "You can take someone who is legally blind [without glasses], give them these intraocular lenses, and get some of them to the point where they can drive without glasses."
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
