To err is human... but it’ll cost you
Ambulatory Safety Monitor, October 14, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Surgeons in Minnesota are about to receive greater incentive than ever to ensure that the procedures they perform go off without a hitch. Starting on January 1, 2005, major health insurer HealthPartners will no longer cover medical procedures during which adverse events occur.
The decision-which would assess physicians for out-of-pocket expenses in conjunction with medical mistakes like surgery performed on the wrong side of the patient's body or a foreign object being left inside the patient-is the first effort in Minnesota to penalize surgeons for incompetent care. The new policy represents a flipside to the growing wave of "pay-for-performance" financial incentives being offered to doctors across the country for providing high-quality care.
"It's about accountability," Dr. George Isham, medical director for HealthPartners, told the Associated Press. "We're sending the message that things that shouldn't happen shouldn't be paid for."
HealthPartners, the state's third-largest insurer behind Blue Cross/Blue Shield and Medica, has said that the types of errors that the company will no longer pay for happen so infrequently that they don't expect a significant cost savings. Since July of 2003, when healthcare providers in Minnesota became required to report adverse events, there were a total of 40 events reported from hospitals that contract with HealthPartners.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
