Power struggle the primary ill at OH surgical center
Ambulatory Safety Monitor, September 9, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Money is always at issue for any new and fledgling business, but owners of the New Albany Surgical Hospital in Ohio say that bringing in money isn't the problem. It's where the money goes once it gets there that's causing a schism between different management factions.
According to a story in the Columbus Dispatch, at least $1.4 million is at stake in a management dispute between two factions among the owners of the hospital. On one side of the table is Nashville-based company Surgical Alliance, a minority owner, that alleges that the majority owners, a group of 30 central Ohio orthopedic surgeons, are refusing to pay management and other fees.
The physicians, however, have claimed that the money was not paid because of performance issues concerning Surgical Alliance. Furthermore, three of the physicians have now filed a lawsuit in Franklin County Common Pleas Court, claiming that their actions are in response to an alleged plot by Surgical Alliance to appoint a seventh member to the evenly-split, six-person hospital board without observing agreed-upon protocols, which would allow SA to gain majority control and "rubber-stamp" the overdue payments.
The only thing all parties can agree on is that the hospital, which opened in December of 2003 and performs orthopedic and neurological procedures, is not in financial trouble. Both sides have described the showdown as solely a management dispute - one which will likely now be settled in arbitration, upon the recommendation of Franklin County Judge Deborah O'Neill.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
