Pentagon documents shows U.S. unprepared for bioterrorism
Emergency Management Alert, March 29, 2004
The nation is unprepared to detect and respond to a bioterrorism attack, according to parts of an unclassified Pentagon document released this week, the New York Times reports.
The report's release comes more than two years after the anthrax attacks identifying weakness in "almost every aspect of U.S. biopreparedness and response."
For the past two years, the Pentagon reportedly refused to release the study for fear that the information could aid terrorists in attacking America. The Center for Strategic and International Studies, an organization that conducts only nonsecret research for the government and wrote the study, urged the government to release the information. However, the government agreed to release only a small portion of the study.
The dispute revolves around a 44-page analysis titled "Lessons from the Anthrax Attacks: Implications for U.S. Bioterrorism Preparedness," documenting many "systemic weaknesses in the nation's response" to the October 2001 anthrax letter attacks that killed five people. The study also makes recommendations about how to prevent, detect, and respond to such attacks.
Since then, the center and the Project on Government Secrecy attempted to get the Pentagon's permission to publish the complete report. But the Defense Department refused stating the study could "circumvent" Pentagon "rules and practices established to prevent the spread of information associated" with nuclear, biological, chemical, and other weapons of mass destruction.
Several civil libertarians, scientists, public health officials, and emergency response experts challenged the Pentagon's position.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
