OSHA fines CT hospital for workplace violations
Hospital Safety Connection, January 28, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
The Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) cited New Britain General Hospital for 41 workplace safety and health violations that could total $91,500, the Hartford Courant reports.
OSHA began inspecting New Britain General in September after workplace data provided by the hospital rose above the agency's standard. Inspectors found work environments that had potential health and safety risks; the violations did not involve patient care or patient safety.
The inspection turned up 20 safety citations for violations including hazards in compressed gas storage, confined spaces, energy control, and electrical infractions. The violations carry up to $42,000 in fines.
OSHA's health inspection found 17 serious violations that could carry a fine of up to $49,500, including hazards associated with bloodborne pathogens, respiratory protection requirements, eye-wash stations, formaldehyde exposures, and chemical hygiene.
The inspectors also found four less serious violations for minor electrical problems and improper labeling of hazardous chemicals.
The hospital has already corrected some of the problems, but it plans to meet with OSHA officials to discuss some of the other violations. New Britain General received the report January 19 and has 15 business days to either agree to comply with the citations, request an informal conference with OSHA, or contest the findings. Laurence Tanner, president and CEO of the hospital, said the hospital would choose the conference.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
