OSHA to impose respiratory standard on health care facilities
Hospital Safety Connection, January 15, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
As a result of its decision to withdraw its proposed tuberculosis (TB) standard, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) on December 31 said it plans to apply its general industry respiratory protection standard to workers exposed to TB in health care facilities.
New requirements include updating the facility's respirator program, complying with amended medical evaluation requirements, annual fit testing of respirators, and some training and recordkeeping provisions.
OSHA published a proposed TB standard on October 17, 1997, to control occupational exposure to TB. But the agency withdrew the rule from its semiannual regulatory agenda published in the May 27, 2003, Federal Register, citing the 43% drop in reported TB cases since 1993. In addition, OSHA concluded that the risk is lower than expected because many workplaces already comply with the CDC's TB guidelines, so there was no need for a new rule from OSHA.
"Given these positive results, it's appropriate to let CDC continue the successful work it is doing, and focus our resources on reducing workplace hazards that are not being addressed through other control efforts," said OSHA Administrator John Henshaw in a prepared statement. "In addition, based on our extensive review of the issues related to respiratory protection, workers exposed to TB should have the same protections as those exposed to other types of hazards in the workplace."
OSHA plans to phase in enforcement of the new requirements to allow affected employers to come into compliance.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
