Comparing the 1985 Life Safety Code with the 2000 version
Ambulatory Safety Monitor, March 12, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Health care facilities that replace the 1985 edition of the Life Safety Code (LSC) in favor of the 2000 version should know about these major differences:
- The 2000 LSC requires automatic sprinklers to protect all new health care facilities. The 1985 Code didn't mandate them because it relied on building compartments to ensure life safety instead. Facilities with quick-response sprinklers get considerations from the 2000 Code in other areas.
- The 1985 Code doesn't have the exception for smoke dampers in duct penetrations of some smoke barriers based on the use of quick-response sprinklers (exception 2 to 19.3.7.3 in the 2000 LSC).
- The 1985 version automatically considers employee locker rooms as hazardous areas, while the more recent editions of the LSC generally don't (see 18/19-3.2 in the 2000 LSC).
- The 2000 LSC permits kickplates on certain doors.
- The 2000 Code allows corridor doors to have an undercut clearance of no more than 1 in, as opposed to prior requirements for a 3/4-in maximum (see 18/19.3.6.3.1).
- The two versions reference different editions of other important standards, such as NFPA 13, Installation of Sprinkler Systems, and NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities.
- The 2000 LSC updated exceptions for areas open to the corridor that the 1985 version doesn't contain.
- The 2000 LSC offers more flexibility in the geometry of the smoke compartment.
- The 1985 version restricted delayed egress locks to exterior doors only; now, facilities can use these locks anywhere as long as there's not more than one such lock in any one egress path.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Ambulatory Safety Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
