Missing monkey prompts debate over proposed biohazard lab
Emergency Management Alert, February 26, 2003
Already facing opposition, the University of California, Davis' (UCD) plans for a new biodefense research center took another hit last week when townspeople discovered a monkey had escaped from a research lab, the Associated Press reports.
The rhesus macaque monkey disappeared on February 13 from the California National Primate Research Center, which would supply animals to the proposed Biosafety Level 4 lab to study diseases with no known cure, such as the Ebola and West Nile viruses. School officials say the monkey is disease-free, and note that the lab currently raises animals for research on level two and three diseases, which have vaccines or treatments.
The university is one of about a half-dozen institutions that applied this month to the National Institutes of Health for a grant to build the $200 million disease research lab. There are already five high-containment disease labs in the U.S., with plans to build two others.
UCD campus police say one possibility is that after the monkey escaped from its cage, one of the primate center's 278 employees stole it; the monkey is worth $5,000. The monkey escaped while handlers were cleaning cages, slipping behind a row of cages. Employees reported a slurping sound as though the monkey went down a small drain, but examinations of the plumbing with fiber-optic cameras found nothing.
The monkey incident stirred up fears of terrorism or other incidents occurring in Davis because of the new lab. Opponents fear such a lab located 65 miles north of San Francisco would be a target of terrorists or thieves looking for deadly pathogens. Davis Mayor Susie Boyd last week reversed her decision on the project and will oppose the project because of the town's opposition.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Reasons for inadequate fluid intake in the elderly
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
