Study finds reused medical devices increase patient risk
Hospital Safety Connection, January 28, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
A recently released study found that a majority of surgeons believe the use of reprocessed, single-use medical devices poses a threat to patient safety.
The Center for Patient Advocacy (CPA) surveyed surgeons, nurses, and consumers for their thoughts on the hospital process of reusing single-use devices such as surgical blades, catheters, and forceps. To save money, some hospitals reuse such devices by resterilizing and repackaging them, but this process can either compromise the device or fail to completely remove the bodily fluids of previous patients.
The study found that 75% of surgeons say the use of reprocessed devices poses a safety risk to patients, 75% of surgeons and operating room nurses believe hospitals should discontinue the practice, and 71% of surgeons and 82% of nurses say they would be uncomfortable with the use of a reprocessed, single-use device on themselves or a family member.
As for consumers, 65% are unaware of the practice of reprocessing, 70% expect the hospital to inform them if reprocessed devices will be used, and 68% did not know they could request that such devices not be used in their surgery.
The CPA developed a consent form for patients to complete before undergoing surgery to reject the use of reprocessed, single-use devices. Access the form at http://www.patientadvocacy.org/consent_form.htm
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
