CMS adopts Life Safety Code for health care facilities
Hospital Safety Connection, January 17, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
With its adoption of the 2000 Life Safety Code on January 10, the Medicare program is just about on the same page as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations when it comes to fire prevention requirements.
This approval by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) affects all hospitals, long-term care facilities, ambulatory surgery centers, and hospices that receive Medicare funding. CMS set March 11 as the effective date for its adoption of the Code, though it won't enforce the requirements until September 11. The Joint Commission expects its accredited organizations to being using the 2000 edition on March 1.
There are two notable areas that CMS "carved out" of the Code, including a less stringent definition of an ambulatory surgery center and a provision to allow roller latches on corridor doors. A roller latch is a device to keep the door closed, but it is unreliable and may not properly protect patient room occupants during a fire. Facilities that will need to remove roller latches from corridor doors to comply with the 2000 Code could spend as much as $47.6 million to do so; because of this financial burden, CMS extended the deadline to comply until March 11, 2006.
Other key points to the CMS rule include the following:
* Reversing an earlier stance, the agency will now embrace a Code requirement that all new long-term care facilities install corridor smoke detectors
* CMS decided to allow use of a new chapter in the 2000 Code on performance-based design, which allows unique engineering solutions to address unusual building characteristics that the Code might otherwise not permit
To the read the final rule, go to http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a030110c.html and scroll to the CMS heading.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
