Katrina patient death case is settled before jurors can debate emergency planning aspect
Hospital Safety Insider, January 27, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Insider!
Fallout will likely be minimal for hospitals from a court case stemming from Hurricane Katrina that, had it gone to a jury, had the potential to change the way healthcare facilities design emergency power systems.
The case was settled confidentially Tuesday in the midst of the trial in New Orleans, reported The Times-Picayune newspaper.
The family of deceased patient Althea LaCoste sued Pendleton Methodist Hospital, LLC, in New Orleans, saying that LaCoste died in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina because the facility allegedly failed to design its emergency power infrastructure to withstand flood waters and allegedly failed to have an adequate plan in place to transfer patients, according to court documents.
The hospital suffered terrible damage from flood waters and never reopened. LaCoste required a mechanical ventilator when she was admitted to Pendleton Methodist on August 28, 2005. During Katrina's rising waters, the hospital lost regular and emergency generator power, which caused various medical equipment to shut down, according to court records.
The hospital had two generators: one near the ground floor and one on the roof of the building. LaCoste's family argued that if the hospital had invested in a $10,000 submersible fuel pump, the roof generator might have kept operating, The Times-Picayune previously reported.
During the trial, the hospital’s former CEO said a warning about the generator system being susceptible to flooding was never raised with him in 2003 by a vice president of the facility who had written a memo about the concern the year before, according to The Times-Picayune.
Many of the same emergency power concerns will be raised again in an upcoming May trial between Pendleton Methodist and another patient who died after Katrina hit, the newspaper said.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Skills of effective case managers
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- E-mailed
-
- Know the JCAHO's ongoing records review requirements
- Establish an ongoing records review process with five easy steps
- Topic: Study the codes for new orthopedics procedures
- Know the JCAHO's ongoing records review requirements
- Hold a scavenger hunt to prepare for survey
- The pros and cons of geographic rounds
- Peer review vs. risk management review: What's the difference?
- Modifier -25: Is that E/M service really above and beyond the norm?
- Know the medical gas cylinder storage requirements
- Clear up confusion surrounding observation services
- Searched