Katrina patient death case is settled before jurors can debate emergency planning aspect
Hospital Safety Connection, January 27, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Fallout will likely be minimal for hospitals from a court case stemming from Hurricane Katrina that, had it gone to a jury, had the potential to change the way healthcare facilities design emergency power systems.
The case was settled confidentially Tuesday in the midst of the trial in New Orleans, reported The Times-Picayune newspaper.
The family of deceased patient Althea LaCoste sued Pendleton Methodist Hospital, LLC, in New Orleans, saying that LaCoste died in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina because the facility allegedly failed to design its emergency power infrastructure to withstand flood waters and allegedly failed to have an adequate plan in place to transfer patients, according to court documents.
The hospital suffered terrible damage from flood waters and never reopened. LaCoste required a mechanical ventilator when she was admitted to Pendleton Methodist on August 28, 2005. During Katrina's rising waters, the hospital lost regular and emergency generator power, which caused various medical equipment to shut down, according to court records.
The hospital had two generators: one near the ground floor and one on the roof of the building. LaCoste's family argued that if the hospital had invested in a $10,000 submersible fuel pump, the roof generator might have kept operating, The Times-Picayune previously reported.
During the trial, the hospital’s former CEO said a warning about the generator system being susceptible to flooding was never raised with him in 2003 by a vice president of the facility who had written a memo about the concern the year before, according to The Times-Picayune.
Many of the same emergency power concerns will be raised again in an upcoming May trial between Pendleton Methodist and another patient who died after Katrina hit, the newspaper said.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
