H1N1: Nurses protest in CA, while regulators push mandatory vaccine in NY
Hospital Safety Connection, August 12, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Controversy is swirling this month around protection measures for healthcare workers from the H1N1 swine flu virus.
The developments included a rally in San Francisco last week organized by the California Nurses Association. The participants, many of whom wore surgical masks during the rally, protested the firing of a nurse infected by H1N1 allegedly because she complained about inadequate safety standards at University of California/San Francisco Medical Center.
The medical center said it fired the nurse because of unspecified job performance factors.
Meanwhile, the New York State Hospital Review and Planning Council—which falls under the state Department of Health—has approved an emergency action to require all healthcare workers to annually receive a flu vaccine.
The order will become mandatory as soon as it is filed with the New York secretary of state, which could occur as early as this week.
The rule will apply to:
- All medical staff and others who have direct contact with patients
- Staff members that, if they are infected with the flu, could expose patients to the illness
The rule exempts workers who don’t have contact with patients and people whose health would suffer from receiving the vaccine.
“Voluntary programs to increase [healthcare worker] influenza vaccination rates have not resulted in adequate vaccination levels,” the State Hospital Review and Planning Council wrote. The council also noted that healthcare workers often already receive one-time mandatory measles and rubella vaccinations as terms of employment.
The New York State Nurses Association opposes the mandatory vaccination.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
