Joint Commission test appears to conflict with NFPA 25
Hospital Safety Connection, June 24, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
In an exclusive story from HCPro, it appears The Joint Commission’s provisions for main drain tests go beyond what is required by NFPA 25, Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems.
The conflict centers on whether a main drain test can occur at sprinkler system risers and the system low point--as The Joint Commission allows under element of performance (EP) 9 of standard EC.02.03.05--or only at system risers, as required by the 1998 edition of NFPA 25, which the commission references.
And the bigger question may be what other authorities, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, think about the matter.
After numerous discussions with Healthcare Life Safety Compliance, representatives from The Joint Commission and the NFPA remain steadfast in their respective positions.
“The Joint Commission will accept the performance of the required test at EC.02.03.05, EP 9 at either the individual sprinkler risers or from the low point in the system for the standpipes, which would be the main drain test,” says Elizabeth Zhani, spokesperson for The Joint Commission.
“What I will tell you is that low-point drains are just that: Drains for low points in the sprinkler system, that is all,” says James Lake, senior fire protection specialist at the NFPA. Further, “there is no purpose, nor any relevant information that would be attained, by testing a low-point drain other than the fact that the low point drain in fact drains. NFPA 25 does not require the testing of low point drains.”
Read the full story in the current Healthcare Life Safety Compliance, the only publication devoted exclusively to life safety strategies in hospitals.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
