OSHA: Needle removal device may be OK, but placement is the key
OSHA Healthcare Connection, March 3, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to OSHA Healthcare Connection!
OSHA posted a letter of interpretation last week stating that the Q104 needle removal device could meet the definition of a compliant mechanical method for removing a needle under the bloodborne pathogen standard.
Similar to previous letters on needle-destruction devices, however, OSHA emphasized that the interpretation only applied to the limited circumstances described in the letter, and if the device was not located immediately to the area of use, it probably would pose a hazard to employees and result in a violation.
In short, mechanical needle removal and needle destruction devices, like sharps disposal containers, are only effective when they are located in close proximity to where the hazard occurs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to OSHA Healthcare Connection!
Related Products
-
Medical Environment Update
Timely medical compliance news from OSHA, CDC, EPA, and other regulatory agencies!
-
Bloodborne Pathogens Training Video
Meets OSHA requirements for training employees on the bloodborne pathogens standard!
-
Hazard Communication Standard Training Video
Meets OSHA requirements for training employees on the Hazard Communication Standard!
-
Lab Safety Training Made Simple
Written by "The Safety Lady,T" Terry Jo Gile, this book and CD-ROM will help make obligatory lab safety training simple and...
-
Needlestick Prevention Training Video
Highlighting the five most frequent needlestick scenarios, this training video instructs frontline healthcare staff on on...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched