Tip of the week: When it comes to life safety, take a conservative approach to new hazardous areas
Hospital Safety Connection, April 16, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
A Life Safety Code (LSC) issue that can lead to considerable debate is what happens when you construct a new hazardous area as defined in section 8.4. A common example of this in healthcare is converting a patient room to storage.
Because it is likely the storage room is in excess of 50 square feet, it counts as a hazardous area under the LSC, said James Lathrop, vice president of Koffel Associates, Inc., in Niantic, CT.
Since no one argues that this storage room must then meet the various requirements for hazardous areas, the issue becomes whether the area should meet the provisions for new or existing construction (section 18.3.2.1 or 19.3.2.1 in the LSC, depending on classification).
Both sides of this argument have merit, but to be safe, use the more conservative requirements for new construction, Lathrop suggested. The 2009 edition of the LSC will clarify this aspect, he added.
If you want more in-depth information each month about LSC requirements for healthcare occupancies, check out our “Cracking the Code” column in Healthcare Life Safety Compliance.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Tip of the week: When it comes to life safety, take a conservative approach to new hazardous areas ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Reasons for inadequate fluid intake in the elderly
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
