SBA tags bloodborne pathogens standard for rule change
OSHA Healthcare Connection, March 11, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to OSHA Healthcare Connection!
Small healthcare offices and laboratories with only limited worker exposure to blood should have modified and simplified compliance standards, advocates the government's Small Business Administration (SBA).
Each year the SBA Office of Advocacy's Regulatory Review and Reform Initiative, or r3 identifies a top-10 list of regulations that that should be revised because they are ineffective, duplicative, or out of date. This year's r3 list, compiled from 80 nominations by stakeholders, includes the recommendation: Update OSHA's Medical/Laboratory Worker Rule. The update recommends that exposure control plan requirements be "tiered to be more flexible depending on the amount of blood and bodily fluids present at the facility." Cost savings to small healthcare facilities and lower healthcare costs overall would be the benefits of the change. But don't trash your comprehensive exposure control just yet. The SBA list is advisory-asking a regulatory agency such as OSHA only to consider the recommendation. You can track the progress of the rule by going to www.sba.gov/advo/r3. The SBA says it will update its status twice a year.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to OSHA Healthcare Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “SBA tags bloodborne pathogens standard for rule change ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- First board certification for hospitalists announced -- with caution
- Searched
