Q&A: Power outages and the 96-hour rule
Emergency Management Alert, February 12, 2008
When the following question came over the wire, we consulted HCPro contributor Patrick Wade, director of public safety at St. Bernardine Medical Center in San Bernardino, CA, who has successfully managed safety and security through at least eight power outages. Next month, Wade will host an HCPro audioconference, "The 96-Hour Rule: Will your facility's emergency plan hold up?" with emergency planning experts Peg Luebbert, MS, MT(ASCP),CHSP and former Joint Commission Vice President Joe Cappiello.
Q: How would emergency managers amend current plans to prepare for a power outage--while still complying with the 96-hour rule?
A: On an extended power outage you need to watch the generator fuel supply and have some backup process for those areas of the operation that are not required to have generator power-such as the business office, administration, engineering-but that need to continue to operate. Are those operations computer dependent? Wall-hung emergency lights will operate only until the batteries run down. Fire alarm systems are on battery backup until they run down. They are designed to provide backup protection for the fire alarm system until the building can be evacuated. So if you have a mobilization center (MOB) that loses power, and the fire alarm system shuts down, you'll need to close the building, even though it might be daylight and you're able to provide limited patient services. So in this situation, the 96-hour rule becomes the 4-hour rule, provided the batteries are maintained; otherwise it may be the 1-hour rule.
I will tell you from experience that many property management companies do not test the emergency lights in the stairwells or properly maintain the backup batteries in the fire alarm systems.
Comments
0 comments on “Q&A: Power outages and the 96-hour rule ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- First board certification for hospitalists announced -- with caution
- Searched
