Prompted by CDC, IOM lays out post-PAHPA priorities for research
Emergency Management Alert, January 29, 2008
There is an immediate and critical need to define research priorities for the Centers for Public Health Preparedness (CPHP) at schools of public health, says the Institute of Medicine (IOM), in a statement issued this month.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Coordinating Office for Terrorism Emergency Preparedness and Response (COTPER) called upon the IOM this month to conduct a fast-track study and issue a letter report making recommendations on research priorities for emergency preparedness and response in public health systems. This was requested in response to passage of the Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA; Public Law 109-417).
IOM complied. Here's its statement, verbatim:
The IOM identified appropriate research opportunities and a list of three to five top-priority research areas that will likely result in measurable outcomes and near-term impact over the next three to five years. As a framework for their deliberations, the committee considered the areas of interest specifically articulated in the CDC's Advancing the Nation's Health: A Guide for Public Health Research Needs, 2006-2015, with special attention to:
- Protecting vulnerable populations in emergencies (improving the identification of health vulnerability and evaluating interventions to lessen the risk of poor health outcomes)
- Strengthening response systems (developing and evaluating integrated systems of emergency public health services and incident management)
- Preparing the public health workforce (developing and evaluating strategies and tools to train and exercise the public health workforce to meet responsibilities for detection, mitigation, and recovery in varied settings and populations)
- Improving timely emergency communications (evaluating characteristics of effective risk communication in emergency settings and system enhancements to improve effective information exchange across diverse partners and populations under emergency conditions)
- Improving information management to increase use (scenario modeling and forecasting; information and knowledge management tools to improve the availability and usefulness during crisis decision-making)
The committee met in conjunction with a public workshop on December 19-20, 2007, and delivered a letter report in January 2008.
Comments
0 comments on “Prompted by CDC, IOM lays out post-PAHPA priorities for research ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- First board certification for hospitalists announced -- with caution
- Searched
