CMS issues updates to EMTALA regs, IC guidelines
Emergency Management Alert, December 11, 2007
CMS has been busy updating items relating to emergency management:
- On December 7 it issued revisions to the EMTALA regulation at 42 CFR 489.24(a)(2) concerning non-applicability of EMTALA sanctions during public health emergencies declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) pursuant to amendments to Section 1135(b). It has clarified the scope of the waiver; the regulation now specifies that it applies to "both inappropriate transfers and redirection or relocation of individuals for a medical screening examination pursuant to an appropriate state emergency preparedness plan or state pandemic preparedness plan by a hospital located in an emergency area." A time frame of 72 hours for the duration of the waiver has been added, consistent with the statute.
- A "Special Challenges" section covering MDROs, communicable disease outbreaks, ambulatory care issues, bioterrorism, and pan-flu was included in updates to CMS' Interpretive Guidelines for 42 CFR 482.42, Hospital Condition of Participation: Infection Control. They underline CMS' recommendation of an all-hazards approach stressing tight intra-agency support among medical facilities and local, state, and federal agencies. "The duration of a pandemic may present special challenges for staffing, supplies, resupply, etc. Hospitals should work with local, state, and federal public health agencies to identify likely communicable disease threats and develop appropriate preparedness and response strategies."
The IC update, announced November 21, was effective immediately. Revisions were driven by "changing infectious disease threats, as well as new mechanisms to confront these threats," which were needed to "better reflect current conditions within hospitals as well as contemporary infection control standards of practice," said CMS.
The guidelines discuss the applicable requirements for the infection control CoP and related standards, as well as the survey procedures to be used to determine compliance. They also contain discussion and examples of practices that hospitals are encouraged to adopt, but that are not necessarily required by the regulation.
Click here for the IC information.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- First board certification for hospitalists announced -- with caution
- Searched
