Tip of the week: The LSC's rules apply to recyclable materials, too
Hospital Safety Connection, November 28, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
We saw an interesting discussion this week debating whether materials earmarked for recycling fell under the Life Safety Code (LSC).
Someone asked fellow members of the Hospitals for a Healthy Environment listserv about the 32-gal. limit on trash receptacles in paragraph 19.7.5.5 of the LSC.
The LSC doesn't differentiate between trash headed to a landfill and materials that can be recycled. From a fire safety standpoint, paper and plastic are combustible if a fire occurs and can help spread flames.
In brief, the LSC states that in hospitals:
- Trash containers can't exceed 32 gal. in capacity
- The average density of container capacity can't exceed 0.5 gal. per square foot
- You can't exceed the 32-gal. capacity within a 64-square-foot area
- Mobile containers with more than 32 gal. of capacity must remain in rooms with protection features for hazardous areas when the containers are unattended
Authorities generally allow some flexibility, similar to other wheeled carts in healthcare facilities. If an employee goes around a unit collecting recyclables with a 90-gal. wheeled bin, it is okay for the cart to temporarily remain in a corridor that doesn't have hazardous area protection because the LSC considers the bin "in use" by the worker. Generally, CMS and the Joint Commission have interpreted this to mean the bin can remain in the corridor for 30 minutes before it has to be moved again.
Soiled linen containers fall under the same line of thinking--subscribers to Healthcare Life Safety Compliance can check their electronic archives for a related story in the November 2007 issue.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Hospital Safety Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- First board certification for hospitalists announced -- with caution
- Searched
