Tips and tools for rehab professionals: Coordination of the ICD-9 coding process
Rehab Regs, February 20, 2009
Due to the size of their practice or specific internal procedures, some therapy practices may rely on administrative personnel, such as coding and billing specialists, to handle the assigning of the ICD-9 codes to therapy. This can be a helpful scenario to ensure correct coding, but can also be a potential pitfall to problems relating to ICD-9 coding. When the ICD-9 coding process is separated between the evaluating therapist and the billing coordinator, there can be potential miscommunications and inaccuracies. A concerted effort must be made to ensure that both the therapist and the coder agree that the ICD-9 codes used are the best representation of the patient’s condition, resulting in a correctly coded claim. Too often, codes are assigned strictly by a coding specialist who has never laid eyes on the patient to verify the relation of the codes to the therapist-established plan of care.
This disconnect between the billing specialist and therapist can also exacerbate misunderstandings or inaccurate coding patterns on the therapist’s behalf. For example, if a therapist is putting an expired code on a claim and the coder is correcting it prior to submission, the therapist won’t know to change the procedure unless notified of it.
Similarly, the billing personnel may also identify when a claim is missing an ICD-9 code that is necessary for the claim to process through the Medicare contractor as dictated by the local coverage decisions. The billing specialist and therapist should collaborate to identify what codes may be appropriate and seek physician input when necessary. This will serve to educate the therapist and prevent any future problems.
This is an excerpt from HCPro’s book, The Essential Guide to ICD-9 Coding for Therapy Professionals, written by Kate Brewer, PT, MBA, GCS.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched
