Streamline the denials process
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, October 31, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
West Virginia University Hospital (WVUH) in Morgantown had a way of tracking and managing denials that resembled a game of scavenger hunt.
To help streamline denials and organize an official policy, a multidisciplinary team consisting of directors from case management, patient access, finance, and the executive suite mapped out an entirely new denial management protocol. The first plan of action was to designate centralized headquarters for all denials coming through the system, says Christy Whetsell, BSB, RN, MBA, director of care management at WVUH.
"The next crucial step we took was to help define all the different types of denials and assign who would be responsible for each type," says Whetsell.
After establishing key contacts with each of the payers and adequately getting the message out about how and where to send denial notices, Whetsell and the interdisciplinary team focused on the internal steps of denial management.
A centralized electronic database was created, allowing anyone involved in the denials process access to information about any denial, any time. Case management checks the database daily, monitors start and end dates, and tracks the response activity between the hospital and payers.
Since overhauling its entire denials management program two years ago, the hospital has seen the following improvements:
- Physicians now seeking information related to their denials and actively participating in the appeal process, which leads to stronger appeal letters
- A decreased turnaround time with appeal submissions and financial resolutions
- Overall denial awareness from every healthcare professional involved in patient care
The biggest mark of success, however, is in the hospital's bottom line.
In 2005, before revamping its denials management program, WVUH had a denial reversal rate of 50%, compared to 2007 when 80% of all denials were reversed in the hospital's favor.
"We've improved because of our tracking methods, interdisciplinary collaboration, and relationships with payers," says Whetsell. "If we didn't make these changes, we'd be in the same boat."
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
