MD Anderson formalizes patient access functions, tasks
Patient Access Weekly Advisor, October 10, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
MD Anderson Cancer Center is a Houston-based specialty hospital providing inpatient and outpatient services for patients with cancer and those suspected of having cancer. The organization sees approximately 26,000 new patients each year and schedules and financially clears about 1.8 million outpatient appointments.
Patient access staff members are in each department and are responsible for patient registration and financial clearance functions. However, MD Anderson previously lacked a formal staffing model for patient access. MD Anderson's patient access departments teamed up with performance improvement staff to develop a staffing model for patient access.
At its most basic form, a staffing model illustrates the merging of the amount of time it takes to perform a task and the number of times that task is performed. However, in actual real-world applications, the complexity of accurately calculating staffing needs can be overwhelming.
To determine the number of necessary full-time equivalents (FTE), MD Anderson needed to calculate the number of productive hours an employee works per year. The standard 2,080 hours is not an accurate reflection. The staffing model team analyzed payroll data and determined that the average patient access specialist worked 1,850 productive hours per year. The hospital excluded nonproductive hours (e.g., vacation, sick days, and training) and factored in an additional 14% of the productive hours to account for personal time, fatigue, delays, and interruptions. The team also eliminated the supervisor from the final required FTE count.
Provided by Connie Longuet and David Bivens
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Access Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
