Lawsuit claims hospital monopoly meant higher prices for patients
Patient Financial Services Weekly Advisor, August 17, 2007
The day after Evanston Northwestern Healthcare was ruled as "anti-competitive" by the FTC, Jeffrey Porter of Evanston, IL, sued the facility, claiming the hospital's monopoly meant patients had to pay higher prices, according to an August 8 article in the Chicago Tribune.
The lawsuit stated that Porter, as well as other patients, "had to pay more for healthcare services than they would have paid in a competitive marketplace, unfettered by Evanston Northwestern's monopolization," according to the article.
To read the full story, click here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched
