Tip: Evaluating gainsharing agreements
Patient Financial Services Weekly Advisor, August 26, 2005
Gainsharing is an arrangement that rewards physicians who achieve cost-saving measures. Although the OIG has approved gainsharing arrangements in several advisory opinions, it's wise to exercise caution before entering into any gainsharing agreement.
Any organization considering a gainsharing arrangement should hire a program administrator to keep track of the accounting and administration of the agreements, advises Anne M. Haule, a partner in the healthcare practice of Ungaretti & Harris, LLP, in Chicago. Because agreements typically last a year, hiring an independent consultant to be the administrator may be a good choice.
Haule says imposing a one-year time frame makes sense because this helps ensure the payment is for legitimate gains. "After that, you could perhaps have a different agreement for a different practice change," she says.
Further, for any gainsharing arrangement, cost savings should be spread across care for all patients-not just for Medicare or Medicaid patients.
Before considering a gainsharing agreement, also consider the potential risk involved-to patients and to hospital-physician relationships. "There's also a political risk," Haule says. "Will it help the hospital and the physicians come together or create more hassle?"
Note: Join HCPro LIVE for the audioconference "Gainsharing: Strategies to structure cost saving arrangements" on Thursday, September 15 at 1:00 p.m. EST.
Attend this 90-minute live audioconference and learn how to enter into appropriate gainsharing arrangements and avoid circumstances that might impact patient care, affect compliance, or violate the anti-kickback or physician self-referral (Stark) statutes.
For more information or to register, contact our Customer Service Department at 800/650-6787 and mention source code EZ38520A, or sign up online by clicking here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- First board certification for hospitalists announced -- with caution
- Searched
