Tip: Front-end process target areas to improve the revenue cycle, part 2
Patient Financial Services Weekly Advisor, May 20, 2005
Assessing front-end processes are integral to long-lasting change and improvement in your facility's revenue cycle, says Maria Hogarth, director of revenue cycle consulting at Integra Solutions.
Hogarth spoke during HFMA's Revenue Cycle Strategies Conference May 2 in New Orleans.
Processes relate to all aspects of the revenue cycle and help set all performance levels. You need to be sure all processes are documented, measured, and streamlined, limiting rework that causes headaches for the team.
Before drilling down into the front end, Hogarth recommends checking on the following processes, which can be used in every department:
- Reviewing existing policies and procedures
- Conducting staff interviews
- Observing work in progress
- Developing flow charts and identifying process steps
- Obtaining statistical data
- Auditing productivity, quality, and performance
- Auditing existing backlogs
- Auditing payer denials
- Auditing sampling of accounts activity for processing timeliness
When looking at front-end processes, there are several key focus points to examine:
Scheduling
- Number of same-day cancellations and no-shows
- Average number of days backlog
- Overall scheduling rate
- Percentage of registration errors
- Percentage of point-of-service collections
Preregistration/registration
- Number of same-day cancellations and no-shows
- Percentage of registration errors by type, payer, and employee
- Number of denials due to medical necessity
- Average patient wait times for all areas (inpatient, outpatient, ED)
Financial counseling
- Percentage of true self-pay bad debt write-offs
- Percentage of lost point-of-service collection opportunities per employee
Eligibility verification
- Number and amount of registration errors due to lack of eligibility verification by type, payer, and employee
- Number and amount of denials due to lack of precertification by type, payer, and employee
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Reasons for inadequate fluid intake in the elderly
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
