Tip: Encourage documentation at time of order
Patient Financial Services Weekly Advisor, June 4, 2004
If you need to appeal to Medicare to pay your outpatient/emergency department (ED) claim, you'll need proper documentation to support your cause. That's where documentation at time of order comes into play.
Valerie Rinkle, MPA, revenue cycle director at Asante Health System in Medford, OR, suggests adding a box in the order paperwork for the ED physician to indicate that he or she ordered test(s) based on the presenting condition of the patient.
Also, other managed-care plans that usually deny services ordered in the ED may pay if you present the ordering documentation in this manner, she says.
To qualify for payment, a physician's interpretation must take place before EMTALA screening is complete and the patient is stable, says Rose T. Dunn, RHIA, CPA, FACHE, FHFMA, chief operating officer of First Class Solutions, Inc., in St. Louis.
Documenting the time at which the physician makes an interpretation for ordered tests is crucial in reimbursement, so educate ED physicians on the importance of documenting it in their dictation, written notes, or wet reads, Dunn adds.
"If you can show the test was ordered for EMTALA and that the order was based on presenting conditions, you should get paid for that test," Rinkle says. "As long as the test was ordered prior to the EMTALA screening being completed, payers have to pay because it falls under the umbrella of EMTALA."
Interpretation report formats should include the following elements to support medical necessity:
(1) A place to document the treating physician's/practitioner's ordering indications
(2) A space to document the technologist's indications taken from the patient
(3) An area to document the interpreting physician's final impression
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Reasons for inadequate fluid intake in the elderly
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
