HIPAA Q&A: Sharing patient information with specialists
Compliance Monitor, June 27, 2012
Q: A patient who presented with an order from the primary care physician for laboratory work had also seen a specialist who ordered x-rays. Both physicians were entered into the system, and both received the laboratory test results and x-rays. The patient said this violated HIPAA because the specialist did not need the laboratory test results. Did this violate HIPAA?
A: Pursuant to the HIPAA Privacy Rule [45 CFR 164.502(b)(2)(i)], the minimum necessary standard does not apply when sharing patient information for treatment purposes.
The ultimate question is whether the specialist needed to see the laboratory results with respect to the care being provided. If the answer is yes, the disclosure did not violate HIPAA.
If the specialist should not have received the laboratory results, a breach-although not necessarily a reportable breach-may have occurred. This merits investigation because it would constitute a security incident. All security incidents should be investigated, regardless of whether a breach occurred.
You should investigate this incident. You are not required to notify the patient or OCR if you conclude upon investigation that the patient will not experience significant harm. Refer to 45 CFR 164.402.
You must document the investigation. Responding to the patient complaint and explaining that you are taking steps to implement practices to prevent future similar occurrences is advisable.
Work with the laboratory to the extent feasible to prevent transmission of PHI to providers without a "need to know."
Editor's note: Chris Apgar, CISSP, president of Apgar & Associates, LLC, in Portland, Ore. answered this question, which also appears in the July Briefings on HIPAA. Apgar has more than 17 years of experience in information technology; he specializes in security compliance, assessments, training, and strategic planning. Apgar is a board member of the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange and chair of the Oregon and Southwest Washington Healthcare, Privacy and Security Forum.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note from Hugh
- Steps to comply with HIPAA 2.0: Revise your policies and procedures
- Steps to comply with HIPAA 2.0: Revise your policies and procedures
- Citing HIPAA, CVS to end prescription reminders via mail
- Q/A: How should we report irradiated blood products?
- 2014 SNF Proposed Rule Analysis: Revising and rebasing the SNF market basket
- ACDIS/AHIMA brief provides guidance on query best practices
- CMS issues transmittal to update the Medicare Provider Reimbursement Manual
- Change your EMR to prepare for ICD-10
- 2014 Hospice Proposed Rule Released
- E-mailed
-
- Change your EMR to prepare for ICD-10
- Georgia hospitals scrambling to create residency positions
- Solidify processes to avoid HAC penalties
- Citing HIPAA, CVS to end prescription reminders via mail
- HCA initiative boosts flu shots among hospital workers
- Managing the precertification process
- Q/A: How should we report irradiated blood products?
- Steps to comply with HIPAA 2.0: Revise your policies and procedures
- Guiding principals help ease the sting of injection and infusion coding
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Searched
