From the field: Demand letter confusion
Recovery Auditor Report, December 15, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
A compliance director at a hospital in Region C (who wished to remain anonymous) shared one of her latest recovery auditor stories with the Revenue Cycle Institute. She informed us that her facility has been receiving demand letters from Connolly before receiving the results letters for some complex reviews. Connolly is also sending demand letters that contain both automated and complex reviews, and do not contain the account patient control number, making it more laborious to try to identify the account and the issue. “When this happens, they are essentially throwing in every possible issue that an account could be audited for and making you choose which one they have targeted and identified,” she says. “They are also taking money back on the date of the demand letter without giving the provider a chance to stop recoupment.”
Has something similar happened at your facility? Have you contacted/heard back from your particular recovery auditor?
Help us to understand your RAC experience. Have you been experiencing any type of problems with recovery auditors lately at your facility? Would you like to offer advice to this reader by sharing your experience? If you have tips, ideas, questions, comments, or concerns to share with your peers, then submit them to jcarroll@hcpro.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Reasons for inadequate fluid intake in the elderly
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
