Rebilling patterns a potential red flag for RACs
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies, June 1, 2011
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Learn how a frequent pattern of rebilling can raise a red flag for potential third-party auditors.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Note from Hugh
- Note from the instructor: OIG report on usage of financial liability "G" modifiers
- CMS releases new QAPI resources
- HIPAA Q&A: Receiving faxed HEDIS requests
- Remind your workforce members to ’zip their lips’ when it comes to patient privacy
- CMS says it's not too late to avoid payment adjustments
- Documentation of medical necessity drives successful RA appeals
- Recent Recovery Auditor activity
- Q/A: How do we report therapy G codes and modifiers for multiple therapies?
- E-mailed
-
- Note from the instructor: OIG report on usage of financial liability "G" modifiers
- Q/A: How do we report therapy G codes and modifiers for multiple therapies?
- HIPAA Q&A: Receiving faxed HEDIS requests
- CMS says it's not too late to avoid payment adjustments
- FDA makes new proposal related to C. diff and other threatening pathogens
- Eyes see more ICD-10-CM codes because of laterality
- News: Study shows increase in observation services
- Product of the week: Optimizing PEPPER in the Audit Environment
- Dangers of reporting costs improperly
- CMS releases new QAPI resources
- Searched
