CMS publishes RAC improper payment vulnerabilities for physicians
Recovery Auditor Report, December 16, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Continuing in its endeavor to publicize valuable information derived from the RAC demonstration, CMS released on December 2 the fourth in a series of MLN Matters articles.
The latest, Special Edition article SE1036, provides education on two high-risk vulnerabilities for physician claims. According to CMS, these claims were denied because the demonstration RACs determined that either a duplicate claim was billed and paid, or the physician reported an incorrect number of units for current procedural terminology (CPT) code billed based on the CPT code descriptor, reporting instructions in the CPT book, and/or other CMS local or national policy. The high-risk vulnerabilities are as follows:
- Other services with excessive units - Units billed exceeded the number of units per day based on the CPT code descriptor, reporting instructions in the CPT book, and/or other CMS local or national policy. (Pre-appeal improper payment amount: $6,635,558)
- Duplicate Claims - Physician billed and was paid for two claims for the same beneficiary, for the same date of service, same CPT code, and same physician. (Pre-appeal improper payment amount: $1,094,751
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Recovery Auditor Report!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q&A: Coding for sepsis when other conditions are present
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Searched